|
Updated:
29 Mar 2012, 23:00
ET [Created 10 Oct 2002; original AT&T Worldnet Website begun 30 May 1996.] Update info on the top on ALL pages for your convenience. |
URL
http://berliner-ultrasonics.org/uson-4a.html
(formerly http://home.att.net/~Berliner-Ultrasonics/uson-4a.html moved to this domain on 06 Mar 2010) |
|
S. Berliner, III
Consultant in Ultrasonic Processing "changing materials with high-intensity sound" |
SONOCHEMISTRY * REACTION ACCELERATION * DISRUPTION
Specializing in brainstorming and devil's disciplery for new products and
{"Imagineering"}
Technical and Historical Writer, Oral Historian
HOMOGENIZATION * EMULSIFICATION * POLLUTION ABATEMENT
DISSOLUTION * DEGASSING * FINE PARTICLE DISPERSION
BENEFICIATION OF ORES AND MINERALS
CLEANING OF SURFACES AND POROUS MATERIALS
also see Keywords (Applications) Index
[consultation is on a fee basis]
reverse engineering and product improvement for existing products.
Popularizer of Science and Technology
|
Support and join the UIA
[New 2004 Logo |
|
|---|
On the main Ultrasonics Page:
Applications List.
Probe-type Ultrasonic Processing
Equipment.
Quick Links to Major
Ultrasonic Probe Manufacturers (moved to this page 10 Jul 2002).
Brain Storming - bright
ideas, pipe dreams, pie-in-the-sky?
On Ultrasonics Page A
AL-1C - "CONDENSED GUIDE TO
ULTRASONIC PROCESSING"
(A Layperson's Explanation of a Complex Letterhead).
AL-1P - "A POPULARIZED GUIDE TO ULTRASONIC PROCESSING".
On Ultrasonics Page 1:
AL-1V - "A POPULARIZED GUIDE TO
ULTRASONIC CAVITATION"
(A Non-Technical Explanation of "Cold Boiling"
moved from the preceding page 12 Feb 00).
ULTRASONIC DEGASSING.
TUBULAR HORNS (Radial
Radiators).
CARE of TIPS (Radiating
Faces).
On Ultrasonics Page 1A:
AL-4 - AMPLITUDE MEASUREMENT.
Free Bubbling.
Bubble Entrapment.
Foaming and Aerosoling -
moved 28 May 02 to this Page 4.
Extenders.
Call for Contributions for
Book.
On Ultrasonics Page 2:
More on Cavitation.
AL-2 - "ULTRASONICS AND FINE
PARTICLES -
BENEFICIATION OF SLURRIES AND FINE-PARTICLE SUSPENSIONS
[CERAMICS, COAL & ORES, COATINGS, COLUMN PACKINGS,
SINTERING, SLIPS].
On Ultrasonics Page 3:
AM-1 - "ULTRASONIC STERILIZATION
and DISINFECTION".
UM-1 - "ULTRASONICS, HEARING,
and HEALTH"
Keywords (Applications)
Index.
What's New?
On Ultrasonics Page 4:
Dissolution.
Foaming and Aerosoling
- moved 28 May 02 from Page 1A
and moved again on 10 Oct 04 to this Page 4a.
Ultrasonic Propulsion
(Propulsive Force) - Moving Material - moved on 10 Oct 04 to
this Page 4a.
Ultrasonic Fountains -
Atomization, Nebulization, Humidification,
Misting, Particle Creation and Sizing -
moved on 10 Oct 04 to this Page 4a.
Ultrasonics and Nuclear
Fusion.
Boosters (Booster Horns).
Quick Links to Major
Ultrasonic Probe Manufacturers (moved to this page 10 Jul 2002).
On Ultrasonics Page 4a (this page):
Blanketing.
(09 Jul 08)
Foaming and Aerosoling
- moved 28 May 02 from Page 1A and again on 10 Oct 04 from Page 4.
Ultrasonic Propulsion
(Propulsive Force) - Moving Material - moved on 10 Oct 04 from
Page 4.
Ultrasonic Fountains -
Atomization, Nebulization, Humidification,
Misting, Particle Creation and Sizing -
moved on 10 Oct 04 from Page 4.
More about Probe-type
Ultrasonic Processing Equipment.
Frequency.
Resonant
Bodies (Bells) (materials for horns).
Cooling Samples.
On Ultrasonics Page 5:
Ultrasonic Whistles (Nozzles, Atomizers, Nebulizers).
On the Ultrasonic Cleaning Page:
ULTRASONIC CLEANING {in process}.
Immersible
Transducers.
What's New?
On the ULTRASONICS GLOSSARY page:
ULTRASONICS GLOSSARY {in process}.
ULTRASONICS BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ultrasonic Bibliography Page 1 - Reference Books on Acoustics,
Vibration, and Sound.
Ultrasonic Bibliography Page 2 - Sonochemistry.
Ultrasonic Bibliography Page 3 - Selected Articles.
CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS: I am writing a book on "High-Intensity Ultrasonic Technology and Applications", on the practical application of power (high intensity) ultrasonics, the use of ultrasonic energy to change materials. Contributions are welcome (see below).
[image from University of Washington, Applied Physics Laboratory (Lawrence Crum, Ph.D.)
- bubble diameter approximately 1mm]
ULTRASONICS

Note also that the horn or microtip might well break from over-extension when blanketing occurs
at very high amplitude since the tip "unloads" when the resistence of the liquid is replaced by
the lack of resistance of the gas or resultant foam (see below).
When a foam is generated in a lab sample, it interposes bubbles between the radiating surface and the body of the liquid to be treated or in which treatment is to occur. This is somewhat akin to "blanketing" but is the result of gas bubbles, not cavitation bubbles interfering with free radiation of acoustic energy into the bath. It is a self-limiting process.
Once a foam has been created, especially in viscous liquids, it becomes necessary to stop sonication and degas the liquid. In some cases, at low viscosity, bubbles may rise against gravity and escape through the liquid surface. If, however, they persist in the bath, short bursts of energy (pulsing), with long rest times between, may be sufficient to break the foam. A fine mist of the parent liquid can be sprayed against the foam to break it; ultrasonic nozzles excel at this. In extreme cases, centrifuging and/or vacuum must be applied or the sample may even have to be discarded.
Similarly, on the reverse stroke, molecules of liquid adhering to the surface of a vibrating object may be dragged above the interface (liquid surface) and released, or even ultrasonically nebulized and driven off ballistically, into the atmosphere ("aerosoling"). Obviously, this could pose a significant risk if the liquid is toxic or contains biohazards. Various techniques beyond the scope of this monograph are available to minimize aerosoling or prevent the escape of the aerosol.

As noted above, foam may be broken by applying ultrasonic energy from below the gas-liquid interface but another technique exists which is drawing more and more attention in which acoustical energy is driven through a gas onto the surface of the foam, much as in the '50s and '60s, but with far more effective devices.
Based largely on the work of Prof. Juan A. Gallego-Juárez, Research Professor of the Higher Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), and working at the Instituto de Acústica, Serrano, 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain, this technique utilizes large diameter "plate radiators" which are, in effect, oversized radiating faces driven by relatively "standard" horns. A graphic representation of such a device is shown:

The radiator drives acoustic vibrations through the gas (air) into the foam bubbles, which are stressed beyond their elastic limit and break (pop), thus exposing the next layer of foam bubbles; the process is quite efficient and rapid:

{14 Aug 2002 - preliminary}
This phenomenon can most easily be seen by placing a horn tip just above a liquid and observing the waves that occur on the surface of the liquid; however, this may well cause the formation of standing waves. To visualize the propulsive force, simply turn the horn system at a slight angle and you will see the liquid being pushed away from the tip; increasing the angle will increase the propulsive effect until at over 45° there is more lateral motion than vertical motion:


{09 Jul 2002 - preliminary}
When cavitation is induced in a film of liquid, or at least near the surface of a body of liquid, the bubbles bursting at or very near the gas-liquid interface cause fine droplets to be driven off to some distance:

If either the process is inclined so that gravity has a vector at right angles to the axis of motion of the radiating face, or a gas stream is applied perpendicular to that axis, droplets will act ballistically and fall away dependent on their size. In this way, fine particulates can be produced, such as from molten metals or super-saturated solutions of precipitates, and they can be sorted or characterized by their ballistic trajectories.
See also Ultrasonic Whistles (Nozzles, Atomizers, Nebulizers).
I should note here that two of the oldest and least-cost-effective applications of high-intensity ultrasonic (cavitation) atomization/nebulization are the ULTRASONIC OIL BURNER and the ULTRASONIC CARBURETOR. While both of these applications were eminently successful, technically, they have always failed commercially (to date) because the equipment required has been too costly, and has required too much maintenance, compared to simple mechanical devices used in home and commercial oil burners and in automotive carburetion.
{Refs. (just for examples - there are many of each):
[Oil burners and carburetors are such perennial "better mousetraps" that I used to start my lectures to new engineers and salespeople by warning them NOT to get suckered into spending any time on such schemes as they were almost guaranteed to be approached by would-be Edisons for just such earth-shaking "inventions"-cum-"discoveries"! That does not mean that no one can ever come up with a workable system, but I do notice that when I mention money (as in my getting paid to work on such schemes), the geniuses (genii?) instantly evaporate!]

Horn Terminology

Horn Types

(29 Mar 2012)
Boosters (Booster Horns) are sometimes used to enhance output
amplitude.
Frequency - one problem that frequently (yes - I wrote that!) arises is the question of
what frequency is best for a particular operation. As noted elsewhere, higher frequencies
result in smaller bubble size, penetrating further into crevices or inter-granular spaces but
with lower shock-front intensity, while lower frequencies give bigger bubble sizes with higher
shock-front intensity ("more bang for the buck") but less penetration. In addition,
frequencies lower than 20KHz are readily audible and can cause personal discomfort. When
an experimenter is unsure of which equipment to obtain, the obvious answer is to get a
multi-frequency device; the problem with that idea is that there aren't any such on the market.
Bear in mind that the probe (horn/tool) is a resonant body (i.e.: it rings like a bell) and
so has only one primary resonant frequency (usually ~20KHz or ~40KHz); while it is possible to
design units (and I have had them made) to force vibration at higher and lower harmonics, such
as 10KHz or 80KHz, coping with mechanical impedance in the probe prevents such machines from
being economically viable.
Resonant Bodies (Bells) - talking about frequency (preceding), the materials used for
resonant bodies have to conduct sound well; they are, as noted elsewhere on these pages, "bell"
metals and the horns themselves are longitudinal "bells". If one holds a horn (or
Microtip or extender) at the "sweet spot", the nodal point, and strikes it with a hard object,
it will ring just like a bell. In fact, if not damped, in fact, not only will it ring
purely and sweetly for a very long while before the sound attenuates but such ringing can be
used as a rough test for a cracked horn , which will not ring true. In order to ring, the
material must have the same acoustic properties as any bell and the best bell metals follow
the same series as for electrical conductivity: "SCAG" - i.e.,
Silver, Copper, Aluminum, and Gold.
Close behind these metals are Iron and Titanium. 'Way down the scale comes Stainless
Steel, which is very "lossy" (a poor conductor).
Clearly, the least "lossy" materials, the best conductors, leave a lot to be desired. Silver is soft and malleable, expensive, and very reactive. Copper is also soft, expensive, and reactive, as well as being poisonous. Aluminum, while relatively inexpensive, is soft and reactive. Finally, Gold, while non-reactive, is soft and a wee bit expensive. Iron, while an excellent bell metal, is VERY reactive (rust, anyone?). Two good metals are Nickel and Monel, a nickel alloy, both of which are expensive and hard. Other than being "lossy", Stainless Steel offers a lot; moderate cost, strong, machineable, inert, and readily available; in sheet form, as the diaphragm between the transducer and the liquid in ultrasonic cleaning tanks, it serves quite well. However, it just does not ring well and so is not a good choice for horns. Well, that leaves us with Titanium - also moderately priced, as strong as steel, machineable, inert, and readily available, almost as light as aluminum, AND an excellent bell metal.
Thus, Titanium has long been the material of choice for horns, Microtrips, and extenders.
Cooling Samples - one problem that also plagues researchers is that the energy imparted
to liquid samples rapidly translates into heat, raising the temperature of the sample and
degrading the components. The most obvious solution (another pun?) is to reduce the
intensity of sonication, often quite unacceptable; another is to place the sample vessel (test
tube, beaker, etc.) in a cooling bath. If the rate of temperature rise exceeds the rate of
heat transfer through the vessel walls, increasing the surface area of the vessel can give
better energy dissipation. That can be rather hard to do with very small samples, so, in
the earliest days of the technique, Dr. Theodore Rosett designed the ROSETT COOLING CELL:

As with any glass vessel, avoid contact with the oscillating tip to prevent MICROTIP or vessel breakage.
Please note that a far-more detailed explanation of ultrasonic processing, as well as other technical literature, is available at no charge to consultation clients. However, as what I believe to be a public service, I shall be adding more of my monographs on ultrasonics on this site; watch for them in the main index.
You may wish to visit the main ULTRASONICS page, et seq., with more on ultrasonics, as well as the Ultrasonics Cleaning page and the Ultrasonics Glossary page {in process}.
Those persons interested in SONOCHEMISTRY might wish to look at the sonochemistry pages of:

THUMBS UP! - Support your local police, fire, and emergency personnel!
To contact S. Berliner, III, please click here.
© Copyright S. Berliner, III - 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010 - All rights reserved.
Return to Top of Page